Faculty Member:  STEVEN HALIM
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2003/2004
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  1
Module:COMPUTER GRAPHICS - CS3241
Activity Type:LABORATORY

No. of Respondents:17
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg Score (All Fac. Members)Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members)
1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 3.556 0.984 3.469 3.521
2The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. 3.824 0.809 3.597 3.639
3The teacher is approachable for consultation. 3.824 0.809 3.721 3.772
4The teacher has helped me advance my research (if applicable). 3.600 0.828 3.421 3.463
5The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 3.706 0.849 3.338 3.395
6The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. 3.765 0.831 3.490 3.538
7The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. 3.529 0.943 3.445 3.499
8Overall the teacher is effective. 3.706 0.920 3.586 3.637
Average of Qn 1-7 3.686 0.854 3.501 3.551

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the activity type for each question for all modules offered by the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the activity type for each question for all modules offered by the faculty.


Overall Effectiveness of Teacher (Qn 8) : Frequency Distribution

Scores54321

Fac. Member

3 (17.65%)8 (47.06%)4 (23.53%)2 (11.76%)0 (.00%)

Dept (All Fac. Members, All Activity Types, Same Level)

535 (20.69%)1270 (49.11%)630 (24.36%)116 (4.49%)35 (1.35%)

Fac.(All Fac. Members, All Activity Types, Same Level)

974 (19.75%)2439 (49.45%)1250 (25.34%)196 (3.97%)73 (1.48%)

Module:  COMPUTER GRAPHICS - CS3241


Students' Expected Grades on Module : Frequency Distribution

GradesABCDF

Module

38 (37.25%)48 (47.06%)14 (13.73%)2 (1.96%)0 (.00%)

Dept(All Modules,Same Level)

317 (29.41%)543 (50.37%)181 (16.79%)32 (2.97%)5 (.46%)

Fac.(All Modules,Same Level)

526 (24.82%)1093 (51.58%)439 (20.72%)52 (2.45%)9 (.42%)

Students' Perceived Level of Difficulty on Module : Frequency Distribution

Grades54321

Module

15 (14.56%)51 (49.51%)37 (35.92%)0 (.00%)0 (.00%)

Dept(All Modules,Same Level)

241 (22.13%)572 (52.53%)261 (23.97%)11 (1.01%)4 (.37%)

Fac.(All Modules,Same Level)

434 (20.34%)945 (44.28%)714 (33.46%)33 (1.55%)8 (.37%)

Note: The higher the perceived level of difficulty, the higher the score.


Students' Overall Opinion on Module : Frequency Distribution

Grades54321

Module

13 (12.62%)60 (58.25%)25 (24.27%)2 (1.94%)3 (2.91%)

Dept(All Modules, Same Level)

152 (13.92%)511 (46.79%)355 (32.51%)59 (5.40%)15 (1.37%)

Fac.(All Modules,Same Level)

233 (10.90%)972 (45.48%)758 (35.47%)132 (6.18%)42 (1.97%)

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON FACULTY MEMBER

Faculty Member:  STEVEN HALIM
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2003/2004
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  1
Module:COMPUTER GRAPHICS - CS3241
Activity Type:LABORATORY

Q9  What are the teacher's strengths?
1.NA
2.Good guidance provided and approachable.
3.Helpful during the labs.
4.clear explanation
5.He is excellent student.
6.Friendly, explains well

Q10  What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?
1.NA
2.-NA-
3.nil

Faculty Member:  STEVEN HALIM
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2003/2004
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  1
Module:COMPUTER GRAPHICS - CS3241
Activity Type:TUTORIAL

No. of Respondents:16
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg Score (All Fac. Members)Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members)
1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 3.313 0.602 3.866 3.864
2The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. 3.375 0.619 3.861 3.890
3The teacher is approachable for consultation. 3.375 0.619 3.958 3.990
4The teacher has helped me advance my research (if applicable). 3.182 0.603 3.651 3.675
5The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 3.188 0.655 3.695 3.706
6The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. 3.188 0.750 3.863 3.871
7The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. 3.063 0.854 3.884 3.862
8Overall the teacher is effective. 3.188 0.750 3.934 3.942
Average of Qn 1-7 3.243 0.671 3.835 3.845

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the activity type for each question for all modules offered by the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the activity type for each question for all modules offered by the faculty.


Overall Effectiveness of Teacher (Qn 8) : Frequency Distribution

Scores54321

Fac. Member

1 (6.25%)3 (18.75%)10 (62.50%)2 (12.50%)0 (.00%)

Dept (All Fac. Members, All Activity Types, Same Level)

535 (20.69%)1270 (49.11%)630 (24.36%)116 (4.49%)35 (1.35%)

Fac.(All Fac. Members, All Activity Types, Same Level)

974 (19.75%)2439 (49.45%)1250 (25.34%)196 (3.97%)73 (1.48%)

Module:  COMPUTER GRAPHICS - CS3241


Students' Expected Grades on Module : Frequency Distribution

GradesABCDF

Module

38 (37.25%)48 (47.06%)14 (13.73%)2 (1.96%)0 (.00%)

Dept(All Modules,Same Level)

317 (29.41%)543 (50.37%)181 (16.79%)32 (2.97%)5 (.46%)

Fac.(All Modules,Same Level)

526 (24.82%)1093 (51.58%)439 (20.72%)52 (2.45%)9 (.42%)

Students' Perceived Level of Difficulty on Module : Frequency Distribution

Grades54321

Module

15 (14.56%)51 (49.51%)37 (35.92%)0 (.00%)0 (.00%)

Dept(All Modules,Same Level)

241 (22.13%)572 (52.53%)261 (23.97%)11 (1.01%)4 (.37%)

Fac.(All Modules,Same Level)

434 (20.34%)945 (44.28%)714 (33.46%)33 (1.55%)8 (.37%)

Note: The higher the perceived level of difficulty, the higher the score.


Students' Overall Opinion on Module : Frequency Distribution

Grades54321

Module

13 (12.62%)60 (58.25%)25 (24.27%)2 (1.94%)3 (2.91%)

Dept(All Modules, Same Level)

152 (13.92%)511 (46.79%)355 (32.51%)59 (5.40%)15 (1.37%)

Fac.(All Modules,Same Level)

233 (10.90%)972 (45.48%)758 (35.47%)132 (6.18%)42 (1.97%)

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON FACULTY MEMBER

Faculty Member:  STEVEN HALIM
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2003/2004
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  1
Module:COMPUTER GRAPHICS - CS3241
Activity Type:TUTORIAL

Q9  What are the teacher's strengths?
1.explicit explanation, kindness, patience
2.Nil
3.Steven was a very nice teacher ... just that there was not enough study material to understand properly

Q10  What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?
1.Nil



The National University of Singapore has used reasonable endeavours to ensure that the information posted on this Web-site is correct at the time of posting. However, the University gives no warranty and accepts no liability for the accuracy or the completeness of the information provided.

In providing such student feedback, the University does not in any way, expressly or implicitly, endorse the views expressed or the contents thereof.