| Faculty Member: | STEVEN HALIM | ||
| Department: | DEAN'S OFFICE (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING) | Academic Year: | 2005/2006 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module: | PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY (ENGINEERING ONLY) - CS1101C |
| Activity Type: | TUTORIAL |
| Class Size / Response Size / Response Rate : | 76 / 55 / 72.37% |
| Qn | Items Evaluated | Fac. Member Avg Score | Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev | Dept Avg Score | Fac. Avg Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) (b) | (c) (d) | ||||
| 1 | The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. | 4.091 | 0.586 | 3.882 ( 3.916) | 3.898 ( 3.932) |
| 2 | The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. | 4.145 | 0.621 | 3.917 ( 3.964) | 3.961 ( 4.019) |
| 3 | The teacher is approachable for consultation. | 4.164 | 0.688 | 4.025 ( 4.129) | 4.056 ( 4.144) |
| 4 | The teacher has helped me advance my research (if applicable). | 3.567 | 0.728 | 3.697 ( 3.626) | 3.743 ( 3.725) |
| 5 | The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. | 3.782 | 0.832 | 3.732 ( 3.712) | 3.754 ( 3.749) |
| 6 | The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. | 4.073 | 0.690 | 3.890 ( 3.923) | 3.913 ( 3.952) |
| 7 | The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. | 4.000 | 0.745 | 3.881 ( 3.905) | 3.886 ( 3.913) |
| Average of Qn 1-7 | 4.003 | 0.718 | 3.872 ( 3.902) | 3.896 ( 3.932) | |
| 8 | Overall the teacher is effective. | 4.109 | 0.712 | 3.948 ( 4.002) | 3.977 ( 4.040) |
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| | | ||||||
Self | | | 16 (29.09%) | 30 (54.55%) | 8 (14.55%) | 1 (1.82%) | 0 (.00%) |
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Tutorial), at the same level within Department | | | 406 (28.61%) | 690 (48.63%) | 264 (18.60%) | 38 (2.68%) | 21 (1.48%) |
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Tutorial), at the same level within Faculty | | | 693 (25.88%) | 1497 (55.90%) | 413 (15.42%) | 51 (1.90%) | 24 (.90%) |
Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score :
(a) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial) within the department.
(b) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial), at the same module level ( level 1000 ) within the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score :
(c) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial) within the faculty.
(d) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial), at the same module level ( level 1000 ) within the faculty.
| Faculty Member: | STEVEN HALIM | ||
| Department: | DEAN'S OFFICE (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING) | Academic Year: | 2005/2006 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module: | PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY (ENGINEERING ONLY) - CS1101C |
| Activity Type: | TUTORIAL |
| Q9 | What are the teacher's strengths? |
| 1. | clear in delievering key points, helpful |
| 2. | He is very nice. He is able to communicate to us. He helps us understand the different methods of solving the problems in tutorials. |
| 3. | Encouraging and guides u along |
| 4. | very friendly and nice person, and teaches lifeskills on top of academic ones. |
| 5. | A very easy going person who has knowledge and is approachable when we need clarification during lesson time or even after classes. |
| 6. | He is kind and friendly. He provided us with a lot of encouragement, not just about this module, but also things in our life. He is also able to understand others program written on the white board with just a scan through which was quite impressive because sometimes, the handwritting really gave me a hard time. His teaching method is good. |
| 7. | knowledgeable, helpful, interesting. willing to repeat many times to ensure students understand. |
| 8. | He is very friendly and he has taught us well. |
| 9. | Very clear headed. |
| 10. | Friendly and attentive. Very helpful. |
| 11. | Let all students do the questions |
| 12. | Encourges class participation. |
| 13. | clear and sstraightforward explanation |
| 14. | He is very patient in explaining complecated details. |
| 15. | He is very patient in explaning complex programming problems. |
| 16. | Energetic and good at the skills.And friendly=) |
| 17. | He has proved to be more than a teacher and mentor. He had been a great teacher in imparting both CS knowlege as well as intersting moral insights. He even took the initiatve to take a class photo during our last tutorial. |
| 18. | Proficient in knowledge on Computing; Clear in his explanation (often substantiated with a few examples); Approachable, cheerful, friendly |
| 19. | He is able to converse his ideas well. He delivers his tutorial effectively and that we are able to clear any doubts that we have in the class. He exercises volunteer and thinking skills. |
| 20. | Friendly, understanding |
| 21. | He is patient towards students who are weaker in the module. |
| 22. | very helpful..will try whatever he can to make us understand.....appreciate it.. |
| 23. | Does a round up of the chapter before every tutorial, making things clearer to those who did not quite catch the lecture. |
| 24. | In the beginning of lessons, he provides a short recap on whats important. This helps us get a clearer picture of whats required for the tutorial. |
| 25. | Able to clear doubts |
| 26. | Starts the tutorial with a relevant topic, rouses the interest in the subject |
| 27. | approachable for consultation.enhanced my thinking ability |
| 28. | extremely helpful, clearly teach us concepts, teaching accross the borders if necessary (this is extremely useful sometimes). |
| 29. | Interactive and thought provoking teaching methods. Provoke students to solve dofferent problems besides those in the tutorial. |
| 30. | He is very patient and know his work well. |
| 31. | He does explanations very well. |
| Q10 | What improvements would you suggest to the teacher? |
| 1. | :) |
| 2. | nothing |
| 3. | nil |
| 4. | Time management. He always seems to forget that time passed by quickly, and we always run out of time in the end. |
| 5. | teach more than just whats in the tutorials. |
| 6. | Handwriting can be bigger on the whiteboard. |
| 7. | Keep up the good work |
| 8. | none |
| 9. | It might make the lessons clearer if he could draw up summaries that shows how each skill that we have learned linked to one another. |
| 10. | Perhaps he can do a bit of summary before going through the tutorial questions=) |
| 11. | improve your pronounciation will help the students understand you better. |
| 12. | He should go for personal grooming course. =) |
| 13. | For better explanation of the questions, can try printing out the tutorial solutions on transparencies and present them on the OHP. Because the answers presented by us (students) are quite small and hard to see sometimes. With the reference on standard solution on the OHP, we can be more confident that we are learning the right thing. |
| 14. | NIL |
| 15. | Use a blackboard marker that is not so faint... sometimes i cant see what he is writing on the board |
| 16. | Improve articulation. |
| 17. | don think there's any..i think he's good enough |
| 18. | Be more confident with himself. |
| 19. | -Nil- |
| 20. | give more examples to explain concepts |
| 21. | better time control. |
| 22. | improve communication in english to get the idea accross fluidly |
| 23. | - |
| 24. | Should try to have better time management as he ofthen to do have time for the most difficult question. |
| 25. | Do a summary before the tutorial on what ideas we should know in this tutorial. |