STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:   LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCEAcademic Year:  2014/2015
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTINGSemester:  2
Module:PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010S
Activity Type:RECITATION
Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate :42  /  27  /  64.29%    
Contact Session/Teaching Hour :10  /  10    
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg ScoreFac. Avg Score
(a)     (b)(c)     (d)






1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.593 0.110 4.434 ( 4.313) 4.434 ( 4.313)
2The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.444 0.134 4.243 ( 4.087) 4.243 ( 4.087)
3The teacher provided timely and useful feedback. 4.444 0.145 4.278 ( 4.281) 4.278 ( 4.281)
4The teacher has enhanced my ability to communicate the subject material. 4.519 0.112 4.303 ( 4.243)NA (NA)
5The teacher's attitude and approach encouraged me to think and work in a creative and independent way. 4.630 0.109 4.401 ( 4.304)NA (NA)
6The teacher cares about student development and learning. 4.593 0.110 4.368 ( 4.322)NA (NA)
Average Q1 to Q6 4.537 0.095 4.338 ( 4.258)NA (NA)
Computed Overall Effectiveness of the Teacher. 4.561 0.100 4.389 ( 4.288) 4.389 ( 4.288)

Notes:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score :
 (a) the mean score of same activity type (Recitation) within the department.
 (b) the mean score of same activity type (Recitation), at the same module level ( level 1000 ) within the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score :
 (c) the mean score of same activity type (Recitation) within the faculty.
 (d) the mean score of same activity type (Recitation), at the same module level ( level 1000 ) within the faculty.

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCEAcademic Year:  2014/2015
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTINGSemester:  2
Module:PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010S


Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 1: The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.)

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

17 (62.96%)

9 (33.33%)

1 (3.70%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Recitation), at the same level within Department

|

49 (42.61%)

54 (46.96%)

11 (9.57%)

1 (.87%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Recitation), at the same level within Faculty

|

49 (42.61%)

54 (46.96%)

11 (9.57%)

1 (.87%)

0 (.00%)


Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 2: The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.)

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

15 (55.56%)

9 (33.33%)

3 (11.11%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Recitation), at the same level within Department

|

41 (35.65%)

46 (40.00%)

26 (22.61%)

1 (.87%)

1 (.87%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Recitation), at the same level within Faculty

|

41 (35.65%)

46 (40.00%)

26 (22.61%)

1 (.87%)

1 (.87%)


Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 3: The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.)

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

16 (59.26%)

7 (25.93%)

4 (14.81%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Recitation), at the same level within Department

|

46 (40.35%)

54 (47.37%)

14 (12.28%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Recitation), at the same level within Faculty

|

46 (40.35%)

54 (47.37%)

14 (12.28%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCEAcademic Year:  2014/2015
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTINGSemester:  2
Module:PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010S
Activity Type:RECITATION

What are the teacher's strengths? (21 comments)

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal to 4.5 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. Engaging and motivated.

2. Explains concepts well in recitations. Have a great sense of humour.

3. Explains the content very well. How cool is that?

4. Explanations are clear

5. He is a really caring teacher.

6. He taught very well! He knows what is the most important thing for us to know.

7. Recitations are always fun and interesting, and he also ensures that students are able to understand key concepts by going through step-by-step examples.

8. The prof was exceptionally good in teaching for this module.

9. Very funny and insightful teacher! Dr Leong, I always enjoyed your recitations and you always made sure that the lesson weren't too boring.

10. his explanations are a lot clearer.

11. nil

12. very smart and concise

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal 4.0 and less than 4.5 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. -Clear and patient with content delivery

2. Engaging during recitation.

3. Strongly encourages class participation. Another lecturer with a personality (Y)

4. clear explanation

5. explain clearly the misconceptions what students have

6. teaches concepts well, very knowledgeable.

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal 3.5 and less than 4.0 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. adds humor into teaching

2. funny

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal 3.0 and less than 3.5 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. VERY KNOWLEDGABLE


What improvements would you suggest to the teacher? (19 comments)

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal 3.0 and less than 3.5 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. too knowledgeable and going too fast. expecting too much from students, stressing us out

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal 3.5 and less than 4.0 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. nil

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal 4.0 and less than 4.5 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. -

2. None.

3. dont talk so fast

4. maybe speak more slowly

5. nil

Comments from students who gave an average score greater than or equal to 4.5 for the computed overall effectiveness of the teacher
1. -

2. -NIL-

3. -nil-

4. Nil

5. Nil.

6. None.

7. Nothing regarding his teaching, but the module itself is really tough.

8. Sometimes you might be a little too fast for the weaker students.

9. nil

10. nil

11. nope

12. talk slower

STUDENTS' NOMINATIONS FOR BEST TEACHING

Faculty Member:  LEONG WING LUP, BEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCEAcademic Year:  2014/2015
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTINGSemester:  2

Module Code:CS1010SNo of Nominations:3

1.He is extremely approachable and is able to easily demonstrate difficult concepts. He also doesn't have any airs about him and is passionate about what he does despite not being the lecturer this semester. The methods of teaching (Coursemology) implemented are also rather innovative and helps students strive to do better.
2.Funny, friendly,knowledgeable
3.He taught very well. Really good!