Implementation project write up evaluation criteria [eighty seven points]: I have categorized your project as an implementation project. I have combed through all the submitted proposed evaluation criteria (which you were asked to submit during the project proposal stage) to come up with this composite guideline. The other category is a research project which emphasizes the research aspect and does not account for system implementation. Please let me know if you think I have mis-categorized your project. Appropriateness/Relevance for DL course [7 points]? 5: Definitely (all 7 points) 4: Probably (5 points) 3: Uncertain (3 points) 2: Probably not (2 points) 1: Certainly not (0 points) DL or system prototype [20 points]: How complete is the system to finished product in terms of the following criteria? - User Interface - Completeness - Functionality - Usefulness Scale of resources in DL (if a DL implementation project) and/or Software modules integrated / coding difficulty [10 points]: How difficult was this system to design, code and debug? System Performance [10 points]: How well does this system perform? Was an formal evaluation conducted? - Efficiency: - Accuracy: - Evaluation Innovativeness of solution [6 points]: Quality of project write up [twenty seven points]: - English usage [5 points]: Did you edit and proofread the work so that typos and references were fixed? - Coherence of paper [8 points]: Does the paper flow well? Are arguments and evidence disjointed or well-connected? - Clarity in disclosure [14 points]: Are the implementation details and algorithms described in enough detail to let another DL practioner reimplement your system? Are the details sufficient? - References [7 points]: Are there sufficient references to help guide a reader to understanding your implementation? Is credit to others carefully delineated when appropriate?