Teacher Assessment Report
 
STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  KAN MIN-YEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:INFORMATION RETRIEVAL - CS3245
Activity Type:LECTURE
Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate/Contact Session/Teaching Hour :48  /  23  /  47.92%  /  13  /  26
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg ScoreFac. Avg Score
(a)     (b)(c)     (d)






1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.348 0.135 4.157 ( 4.255) 4.073 ( 4.046)
2The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. 4.261 0.144 4.164 ( 4.292) 4.094 ( 4.089)
3The teacher is approachable for consultation. 4.478 0.106 4.229 ( 4.372) 4.167 ( 4.166)
4The teacher has helped me develop relevant research skills.*NANANANA
5The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.304 0.132 4.080 ( 4.226) 4.004 ( 4.004)
6The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. 4.391 0.104 4.174 ( 4.291) 4.113 ( 4.099)
7The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. 4.261 0.129 4.124 ( 4.228) 4.038 ( 4.016)
Average of Qn 1-7** 4.341 0.099 4.151 ( 4.278) 4.078 ( 4.070)
8Overall the teacher is effective. 4.304 0.117 4.190 ( 4.293) 4.110 ( 4.080)

* This includes skills in research methodology, research problems/questions, literature search/evaluation, oral presentation and manuscript preparation.

** If Qn 4 is NA, it will not be included in the computation of average score (Average of Qn 1-7).

Frequency Distribution of responses for Qn 8

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

8 (34.78%)

14 (60.87%)

1 (4.35%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Department

|

213 (40.80%)

259 (49.62%)

41 (7.85%)

8 (1.53%)

1 (.19%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Faculty

|

300 (32.36%)

456 (49.19%)

132 (14.24%)

23 (2.48%)

16 (1.73%)

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score :
 (a) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture) within the department.
 (b) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score :
 (c) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture) within the faculty.
 (d) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the faculty.

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  KAN MIN-YEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:INFORMATION RETRIEVAL - CS3245
Activity Type:LECTURE

Q9  What are the teacher's strengths?
1.NIL
2.funny, understand the topic that he teach, approachable, try to remember student names
3.humorous and patient to answer all the questions from students.
4.-
5.nil
6.Able to explain clearly and interesting. Gave good examples for each topic.
7.Able to explain concepts very well. Punctual and ends lectures on time.
8.An extremely helpful teacher, who takes time and effort to answer each and every student's query.
9.He's passionate, knowledgeable, and interesting (friendly). He also replies to e-mail quite promptly, and he answers questions in forums quite fast. And he's the best lecturer I know in term of webcast quality. He delivers the lectures with awareness that it will be webcast.
10.----------------
11.NA
12.Good. concepts cleared. Uploads webcasts for all which is important for us to clear concepts.

Q10  What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?
1.NIL
2.-
3.it may be better if we can have more tutorials questions for exercises.
4.-
5.nil
6.-
7.Content is a bit boring sometimes, make lectures more interesting.
8.NIL.
9.Please include our feedback for future versions of this module.
10.----------------
11.NA
12.None

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  KAN MIN-YEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:INFORMATION RETRIEVAL - CS3245
Activity Type:TUTORIAL
Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate/Contact Session/Teaching Hour :41  /  19  /  46.34%  /  10  /  20
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. DevDept Avg ScoreFac. Avg Score
(a)     (b)(c)     (d)






1The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.211 0.123 3.983 ( 4.030) 3.953 ( 3.927)
2The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. 4.158 0.138 4.017 ( 4.065) 4.019 ( 4.013)
3The teacher is approachable for consultation. 4.263 0.129 4.094 ( 4.169) 4.092 ( 4.096)
4The teacher has helped me develop relevant research skills.*NANANANA
5The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. 4.158 0.115 3.897 ( 4.000) 3.881 ( 3.908)
6The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. 4.158 0.115 3.990 ( 4.068) 3.970 ( 3.962)
7The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. 4.053 0.120 3.998 ( 4.025) 3.964 ( 3.911)
Average of Qn 1-7** 4.167 0.111 3.997 ( 4.060) 3.980 ( 3.969)
8Overall the teacher is effective. 4.158 0.115 4.019 ( 4.073) 4.004 ( 3.985)

* This includes skills in research methodology, research problems/questions, literature search/evaluation, oral presentation and manuscript preparation.

** If Qn 4 is NA, it will not be included in the computation of average score (Average of Qn 1-7).

Frequency Distribution of responses for Qn 8

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)


|






ITEM\SCORE

|

5

4

3

2

1


|






Self

|

4 (21.05%)

14 (73.68%)

1 (5.26%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Tutorial), at the same level within Department

|

126 (31.66%)

197 (49.50%)

58 (14.57%)

12 (3.02%)

5 (1.26%)

Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Tutorial), at the same level within Faculty

|

167 (27.51%)

301 (49.59%)

110 (18.12%)

21 (3.46%)

8 (1.32%)

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score :
 (a) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial) within the department.
 (b) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the department.
5. Fac. Avg Score :
 (c) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial) within the faculty.
 (d) the mean score of same activity type (Tutorial), at the same module level ( level 3000 ) within the faculty.

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:  KAN MIN-YEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2
Module:INFORMATION RETRIEVAL - CS3245
Activity Type:TUTORIAL

Q9  What are the teacher's strengths?
1.-
2.teach more relevant useful contents based on one tutorial question.
3.-
4.nil
5.Able to explain concepts very well.
6.An extremely helpful teacher, who takes time and effort to answer each and every student's query.
7.He asked questions in a way that encourage students to answer the question. He has a good class management.
8.----------------
9.NA
10.Good

Q10  What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?
1.-
2.it may be better if we can have more tutorials questions for exercises.
3.-
4.nil
5.NIL
6.-
7.----------------
8.NA
9.None

STUDENTS' NOMINATIONS FOR BEST TEACHING

Faculty Member:  KAN MIN-YEN
Department:  COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year:  2011/2012
Faculty:  SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester:  2

Module Code:CS3245No of Nominations:7

1.he is knowledgeable, really understand the topic he teach. he also try to make friend with student
2.The reason I chose him from the rest is because I can really feel his care and concern for all his students. Many heartfelt thanks to him for being such a good lecturer.
3.Very meticulous in teaching




2012 National University of Singapore. All Rights Reserved. For inquiries, please email to: ccence@nus.edu.sg