| Faculty Member: | TAN YEE FAN | ||
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Academic Year: | 2004/2005 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module: | DATA STRUCTURES AND ALGORITHMS - CS1102CY | ||
| Activity Type: | LABORATORY | ||
| No. of Respondents: | 19 | ||
| Qn | Items Evaluated | Fac. Member Avg Score | Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev | Dept Avg Score (All Fac. Members) | Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability. | 3.895 | 0.658 | 3.466 | 3.470 |
| 2 | The teacher provides timely and useful feedback. | 4.158 | 0.602 | 3.554 | 3.557 |
| 3 | The teacher is approachable for consultation. | 4.278 | 0.575 | 3.730 | 3.734 |
| 4 | The teacher has helped me advance my research (if applicable). | 4.125 | 0.641 | 3.429 | 3.434 |
| 5 | The teacher has increased my interest in the subject. | 3.632 | 0.831 | 3.357 | 3.361 |
| 6 | The teacher has helped me acquire valuable/relevant knowledge in the field. | 4.053 | 0.621 | 3.498 | 3.501 |
| 7 | The teacher has helped me understand complex ideas. | 4.000 | 0.594 | 3.454 | 3.458 |
| 8 | Overall the teacher is effective. | 4.105 | 0.658 | 3.572 | 3.576 |
| Average of Qn 1-7 | 4.008 | 0.667 | 3.502 | 3.506 |
Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of
variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average
Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation.
The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the
number given as average.
4. Dept Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the
activity type for each question for all modules offered by the
department.
5. Fac. Avg Score (All Fac. Members): The mean of all the scores of the
activity type for each question for all modules offered by the faculty.
Frequency Distribution on Overall Effectiveness of Teacher - Qn 8
| Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents) |
| | | ||||||
ITEM\SCORE | | | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| | | ||||||
Self | | | 5 (26.32%) | 11 (57.89%) | 3 (15.79%) | 0 (.00%) | 0 (.00%) |
Teachers teaching Module at the Same Level (Dept) | | | 1843 (21.97%) | 4299 (51.26%) | 1854 (22.11%) | 270 (3.22%) | 121 (1.44%) |
Teachers teaching Module at the Same Level (Fac) | | | 2119 (19.95%) | 5532 (52.09%) | 2462 (23.18%) | 358 (3.37%) | 149 (1.40%) |
| Faculty Member: | TAN YEE FAN | ||
| Department: | COMPUTER SCIENCE | Academic Year: | 2004/2005 |
| Faculty: | SCHOOL OF COMPUTING | Semester: | 1 |
| Module: | DATA STRUCTURES AND ALGORITHMS - CS1102CY |
| Activity Type: | LABORATORY |
| Q9 | What are the teacher's strengths? |
| 1. | - |
| 2. | He put up a webpage with explanations on topics students generally had trouble with. |
| 3. | / |
| 4. | ... |
| 5. | Very nice in explaining things. Give a quick reply if I ask him through e-mail. Have some analogies to describe somethings that is complex. Always spare some times to answer questions on forum. Make a miniature to help me understand the course. |
| 6. | He is very active on the forum |
| 7. | He is very helpful and willing to clear our doubts. He also provided some extra information based on our queries. He is a very good TA. |
| 8. | Very helpful and has a good knowledge in the subject. |
| Q10 | What improvements would you suggest to the teacher? |
| 1. | - |
| 2. | none |
| 3. | / |
| 4. | ... |
| 5. | Hmm maybe provide answer to the additional question that he made |
| 6. | no |
| 7. | Mark the labs less strictly. |