[The Business Times] As AI firms call for accountability and limits, an opportunity beckons for Singapore
Professor Anthony Tung from NUS Computing was quoted in The Business Times on 15 September on what a slowdown in AI development would need to look like in practice, and where Singapore fits in.
The article followed an essay by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calling for a slower pace of AI capability development, backed by third-party evaluators, common safety standards and coordination between governments. Prof Tung, who is also AI lead for urban sustainability at the NUS AI Institute, said what is currently missing is rules with teeth: there are no agreed conditions for when an AI lab should stop, or what evidence should allow it to proceed. His suggestion is that a lab release a capability only as fast as accredited independent evaluators can assess it, so that the pace is set by evaluation throughput rather than by a competitor's release schedule. He cautioned that obligations should scale with risk, as a one-size-fits-all approach risks entrenching the very frontier labs regulation is meant to restrain.
On Singapore's position, Prof Tung noted that accreditation under schemes such as AI Verify establishes that a tester is competent within a defined scope, not that an AI system is safe. He pointed to a gap in how software safety, cybersecurity and AI safety are treated as separate disciplines with separate funding and regulators, even as incidents increasingly span all three, and suggested Singapore set up an institute with a mandate across all three areas. "A slowdown on its own is not a safety policy," he said, adding that the time gained has to be invested in better evaluation, stronger safeguards and more resilient systems around AI.