NUS Student Feedback - MODULE EVALUATION REPORT for 1810-CS3216-L

MODULE EVALUATION REPORT

Module	CS3216 - Software Product Engineering for Digital Markets
Academic Year/Sem	2018/2019 - Sem 1
Department	COMPUTER SCIENCE
Faculty	SCHOOL OF COMPUTING

Note: Class Size = Invited; Response Size = Responded; Response Rate = Response Ratio

Table for -Student Feedback 1810.
Raters	Student
Responded	21
Invited	26
Response Ratio	81%

1. Overall opinion of the module

Frequency Analysis

1. What is your overall opinion of the module?

Graphs illustrating the information in the accessible table that should immediately follow it.

Table for 1. Overall opinion of the module-1. What is your overall opinion of the module? -Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	20
Mean	4.3
Standard Deviation	1.0

Normative Analysis

Table for .
Question	Module Average (1810-CS3216-L)		Dept Avg (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Fac Avg (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)		Dept Avg by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE (Level 3000))		Fac Avg by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE (Level 3000))
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
What is your overall opinion of the module?	4.3	1.0	3.8	1.0	3.8	1.0	3.5	1.1	3.6	1.0

2. Expected Grade

Frequency Analysis

1. The grade that I am most likely to get in the module is:

Table for 2. Expected Grade-1. The grade that I am most likely to get in the module is: -Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	20
Mean	4.6
Standard Deviation	0.5

Normative Analysis

Table for .
Question	Module Average (1810-CS3216-L)		Dept Avg (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Fac Avg (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)		Dept Avg by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE (Level 3000))		Fac Avg by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE (Level 3000))
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
The grade that I am most likely to get in the module is:	4.6	0.5	4.1	0.8	4.1	0.8	4.2	0.7	4.2	0.6

3. Difficulty Level of the module

Frequency Analysis

1. I rate this module as:

Table for 3. Difficulty Level of the module-1. I rate this module as:-Statistics.
Statistics	Value
Response Count	21
Mean	4.1
Standard Deviation	0.5

Normative Analysis

Table for .
Question	Module Average (1810-CS3216-L)		Dept Avg (COMPUTER SCIENCE)		Fac Avg (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING)		Dept Avg by Activity & Level (COMPUTER SCIENCE-LECTURE (Level 3000))		Fac Avg by Activity & Level (SCHOOL OF COMPUTING-LECTURE (Level 3000))
Question	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation	Mean	Standard Deviation
I rate this module as:	4.1	0.5	4.0	0.8	3.8	0.8	3.8	0.8	3.8	0.7

WHAT I LIKE / DISLIKE ABOUT THE MODULE

What I liked about the module:

Table for [QTitle].

Comments

Get really a lot of hands-on experience.

– Talks from founders of startups

– Good prof, good teammates, good product.

Workload. Freedom to do almost anything.

Very open for ideas. Best to take the module in year 3/4 for self validation.

Fun, a lot of interesting practical knowledge, very hands-on

freedom to build anything you want (as long as there're users)

What I did not like about the module:

Table for [QTitle].

Comments

The workload is way too big for a 5 MC mod, I speed unproportional amount of time on it.

– Way too much writing assignments
- Not enough freedom for final project
- Being graded based on STePS votes is the worst idea ever

– So much stress. But it taught me to manage stress better.

The tutor feedback could be more personal, where maybe the tutors could spend some time engaging the group they marked to give further feedback instead of just mentioning what is wrong.

too much writing