STUDENTS' RATINGS ON INSTRUCTOR/TUTOR

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3 Module: PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010FC Activity Type: LECTURE
 Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate : 49  /  37  /  75.51%
 Contact Session/Teaching Hour : 15  /  30
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev

1The Instructor has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.946 0.038
2The Instructor provided timely and useful feedback. 4.703 0.076
3The Instructor has increased my interest in the subject. 4.649 0.141
4Overall effectiveness of the Instructor. 4.892 0.052

QN/SCORE54321

 Qn 1 to Qn 3 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
 Qn 4 Excellent Good Average Below Average Poor

Notes:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES ON INSTRUCTOR/TUTOR

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3 Module: PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010FC Activity Type: LECTURE

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 1: The Instructor has enhanced my thinking ability.)
 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 2 1 | Self | 35 (94.59%) 2 (5.41%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 2: The Instructor provided timely and useful feedback.)

 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 2 1 | Self | 26 (70.27%) 11 (29.73%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 3: The Instructor has increased my interest in the subject.)

 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 2 1 | Self | 29 (78.38%) 6 (16.22%) 1 (2.7%) 1 (2.7%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 4: Overall effectiveness of the Instructor.)

 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 3 2 1 | Self | 33 (89.19%) 4 (10.81%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3 Module: PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010FC Activity Type: LECTURE

 What improvements would you suggest to the Instructor? (20 comments) 1. -Nil- 2. Articulating of abstract thoughts or concepts can be improved, though in general we have no difficulty understanding what the professor is teaching or lecturing. 3. Can be rather hasty and brief in explanations, need to slow down and be more detailed with the explanations. 4. Continue staying cool. 5. Go a bit slower and don't expect everyone to understand straight away. 6. He can afford to improve the way he speaks. 7. His creativeness in crafting questions is out of this world. Perhaps you can tone it down a little? While yes this will force us to think and possibly improve on out thinking level, it does cause a lot of suffering in this course. 8. In the initial stage of the course, it was difficult for students to catch up with the coursework because of the lack of background in programming. Although help was provided, I think this was the reason many students dropped the course. 9. NA 10. NIL 11. Nil 12. None 13. None. 14. Nope, Prof Ben is a great Instructor! 15. Online lectures are a little too fast, and could be slowed down 16. Sometimes the way he teach, only his level of knowledge can understand. For us students, he must lower his thinking skills and see how we students see the problem and from there, guide us to think more efficiently. 17. Sometimes, may get carried away with exploring new concepts that weaker students may get left behind. 18. You're doing an awesome job! Please continue to do what you're already doing! :-) 19. keep up the good work prof! 20. nil

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON INSTRUCTOR/TUTOR

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3 Module: PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010FC Activity Type: TUTORIAL
 Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate : 49  /  36  /  73.47%
 Contact Session/Teaching Hour : 20  /  20
QnItems EvaluatedFac. Member Avg ScoreFac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev

1The Tutor has enhanced my thinking ability. 4.917 0.047
2The Tutor provided timely and useful feedback. 4.667 0.080
3The Tutor has increased my interest in the subject. 4.694 0.125
4Overall effectiveness of the Tutor. 4.889 0.053

QN/SCORE54321

 Qn 1 to Qn 3 Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree
 Qn 4 Excellent Good Average Below Average Poor

Notes:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
3. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the robustness of the number given as average.

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES ON INSTRUCTOR/TUTOR

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3 Module: PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010FC Activity Type: TUTORIAL

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 1: The Tutor has enhanced my thinking ability.)
 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 2 1 | Self | 33 (91.67%) 3 (8.33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 2: The Tutor provided timely and useful feedback.)

 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 2 1 | Self | 24 (66.67%) 12 (33.33%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 3: The Tutor has increased my interest in the subject.)

 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 2 1 | Self | 29 (80.56%) 5 (13.89%) 2 (5.56%) 0 (0%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 4: Overall effectiveness of the Tutor.)

 Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)
 | ITEM\SCORE | 5 4 3 2 1 | Self | 32 (88.89%) 4 (11.11%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3 Module: PROGRAMMING METHODOLOGY - CS1010FC Activity Type: TUTORIAL

 What are the Tutor's strengths? (21 comments) 1. *As above* 2. - 3. - 4. Able to anchor the entire CS1010FC course almost by himself, always thinking of his students, always tries to make the course as enjoyable for the students as possible. Also teachers in a fun and interactive manor. 5. Able to make us think of different ways to solve the same problem. 6. As above in Part 3. 7. As above. 8. Being able to engage the class, showing care and concern. 9. Can solve alot of problems! 10. Creative and cool 11. Engaging speaker, competent and has a strong passion in teaching. 12. Good use of the WebEx platform, e.g. whiteboard, during online recitations. Very patient and willing to "stay back" after the end of the lesson to answer students' queries. 13. He is able to emphasize learning on top of getting the right answer. He challenges our creativity by coming up with creative solutions and teaching us how to be creative He is able to individually engage each student Knows each student individually, sometimes better than the tutors. 14. He is inspiring, witty, humorous and engaging. 15. Interesting and able to help us students tackle the problem from another perspective. 16. NIL 17. Prof Ben is engaging and the structure of this Imooc modules has been made interesting through online game-like ideas 18. Same as above 19. Same as above 20. See above 21. Very inspiring and good at what he is doing.

 What improvements would you suggest to the Tutor? (17 comments) 1. *As above* 2. - 3. - 4. -Nil- 5. Articulating of abstract thoughts or concepts can be improved, though in general we have no difficulty understanding what the professor is teaching or lecturing. 6. As above in Part 3. 7. As above. 8. He can afford to improve the way he speaks. 9. NA 10. NIL 11. NIL 12. Nil 13. Nil. 14. Nope, Prof Ben is a great Tutor! 15. Same as above 16. You're doing an awesome job! Please continue to do what you're already doing! :-) 17. nil

STUDENTS' NOMINATIONS FOR BEST TEACHING

 Faculty Member: LEONG WING LUP, BEN Department: COMPUTER SCIENCE Academic Year: 2013/2014 Faculty: SCHOOL OF COMPUTING Semester: 3

 Module Code: CS1010FC No of Nominations: 26