I'm evaluating your projects based on a conference review form, except
that I have assigned numeric weights to the parts.  Contrary to a
previous announcement, I have been told not to make the final scores
for the class directly available to you, the grades will be made
available through the normal means (e.g., your academic transcript).
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.  --Min

Score: (score)
Maximum possible score: (max)

Generated on time: (time)
======================================================================


Poster presentation [thirteen points]
	Oral presentation [5 points]:

	Slide Quality [5 points]: 

	Questions asked during presentation [3 points]:

Paper writeup [eighty-seven points]


Appropriateness for DL course [7 points]? 
        5: Definitely (all 7 points)
        4: Probably (5 points)
        3: Uncertain (3 points)
        2: Probably not (2 points)
        1: Certainly not (0 points)

Correctness: Does the paper appear to be flawed technically and/or
methodologically [10 points]? 
        5: Impeccable (12 points)
        4: The paper is OK (10 points)
        3: Only trivial flaws (9 points)
        2: Minor flaws that must be corrected (8 points)
        1: Major flaws that make the paper unsound/inconsistent (2 points)

Check Technical Details [7 points]: 

English usage [5 points]: 

Significance: How important is the work [10 points]? 
        5: Will change the future (14 points)
        4: People will read and cite this paper (10 points)
        3: Restricted interest (9 points)
        2: Not of compelling interest (7 points)
        1: Will have no impact on the field (3 points)

Originality: How novel is the approach [12 points]?  
        5: A radically new approach (15 points)
        4: An innovative use (12 points)
        3: A new application of well known techniques (11 points)
        2: Yet another application of well worn techniques (10 points)
        1: Entirely derivative (8 points)

Evaluation: Does this paper contain information about evaluation [12 points]? 
        Excellent (12 points)
        Good (11 points)
        OK (10 points)
        Lack (Should have contained some evaluation, but it didn't; 
           or it did but the evaluation was bogus) (8 points)
        Not Apply (12 points)
	No evaluation, but there should have been (5 points)

Clarity: Is it clear what was done [12 points]? 
        5: Presentation is very clear (13 points)
        4: Difficult, but understandable (10 points)
        3: Some parts were not clear to me (9 points)
        2: Most of the paper is unclear (8 points)
        1: Presentation is very confusing (6 points)

References: Is the bibliography relevant and exhaustive [10 points]
        5: Thorough (10 points)
        4: Pretty good, but a few missing (9 points)
        3: Some citations, but some missing (8 points)
        2: Scrappy citations; a lot missing (5 points)
        1: Virtually no relevant references cited (2 points)

Is credit to others and delineation of the project clear? [2 points]