Research project write up evaluation criteria [eighty seven points]: I
have categorized your project as a research-oriented one.  Thus I'm
using the edited conference review guidelines from our course website
to grade your work.  The other category is an implementation project
which de-emphasizes the research aspect and heavily weighs the
implementation and finished qualities of a system prototype.  Please
let me know if you think I have mis-categorized your project.

Appropriateness/Relevance for DL course [7 points]? 
        5: Definitely (all 7 points)
        4: Probably (5 points)
        3: Uncertain (3 points)
        2: Probably not (2 points)
        1: Certainly not (0 points)

Correctness: Does the paper appear to be flawed technically and/or
methodologically [10 points]? 
        5: Impeccable (12 points)
        4: The paper is OK (10 points)
        3: Only trivial flaws (9 points)
        2: Minor flaws that must be corrected (8 points)
        1: Major flaws that make the paper unsound/inconsistent (2 points)

Check Technical Details [7 points]: 

English usage [5 points]: 

Significance: How important is the work [10 points]? 
        5: Will change the future (14 points)
        4: People will read and cite this paper (10 points)
        3: Restricted interest (9 points)
        2: Not of compelling interest (7 points)
        1: Will have no impact on the field (3 points)

Originality: How novel is the approach [12 points]?  
        5: A radically new approach (15 points)
        4: An innovative use (12 points)
        3: A new application of well known techniques (11 points)
        2: Yet another application of well worn techniques (10 points)
        1: Entirely derivative (8 points)

Evaluation: Does this paper contain information about evaluation [12 points]? 
        Excellent (12 points)
        Good (11 points)
        OK (10 points)
        Lack (Should have contained some evaluation, but it didn't; 
           or it did but the evaluation was bogus) (8 points)
        Not Apply (12 points)
	No evaluation, but there should have been (5 points)

Clarity: Is it clear what was done [12 points]? 
        5: Presentation is very clear (13 points)
        4: Difficult, but understandable (10 points)
        3: Some parts were not clear to me (9 points)
        2: Most of the paper is unclear (8 points)
        1: Presentation is very confusing (6 points)

References: Is the bibliography relevant and exhaustive [10 points]
        5: Thorough (10 points)
        4: Pretty good, but a few missing (9 points)
        3: Some citations, but some missing (8 points)
        2: Scrappy citations; a lot missing (5 points)
        1: Virtually no relevant references cited (2 points)

Is credit to others and delineation of the project clear? [2 points]