|
|
| What
about incompatible schemas? |
|
| SW’s
Answer: OWL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ¡ | RDF Schema is
fine if one person/organization is |
||||||||
| authoring all
of SW |
|||||||||
| l | Inconsistencies
among different authors |
||||||||
| ¡ | OWL strengthens
RDF Schema with some 30 |
||||||||
| additional
interchange properties |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| owl:samePropertyAs
= A and B same |
|||||
| across schemas |
|||||
| owl:inverseOf,
A is inverse property of B |
|||||
| owl:TransitiveProperty,
allows |
|||||
| transitivity |
|||||
| (e.g. A B, B C, then A C) |
|||||
