1
|
- Reference Interviews
- Week 8 KAN Min-Yen
|
2
|
|
3
|
- Process where the user comes to the reference desk and asks for
information
- What type of information do people ask for?
- What are the characteristics of a reference interview?
- What factors lead to a “successful” reference interview?
- How do we evaluate reference interviews?
|
4
|
|
5
|
- Check whether a (human) system provides the user with a right answer
- Complete
- Accurate and timely
- What is the percentage of questions answered correctly?
|
6
|
- Some explanations:
- easy questions may have been eliminated (e.g., no direction queries).
- questions may have been time-sensitive and/or unusually difficult.
- Murfin (70) shows that librarian often misinterprets the question
asked.
- Gives definitive answer without verifying with user’s need.
|
7
|
- The librarian:
- I think it went all right from my viewpoint because I didn’t have to
really interact too much. She
seemed capable, she seemed to know what she was doing. I felt she had found what she wanted
because she said she had what she needed. She seemed to be capable of handling
it on her own.
- - Radford (99)
- Would you say that this was a successful interview?
|
8
|
- The student:
- I felt like she couldn’t help me on my subject. Isn’t that she didn’t know the
answer, but I felt that she didn’t want to [help]… she looked like she
did not know what I was talking about, a blank stare and also almost
like irritated.
- Would you say that this was a successful interview?
|
9
|
- When a group of MLS students were sent on a mission to the library to
ask a question…
- 60% said that they might ask another question in the future
- 30% said that they wouldn’t bother asking the librarian even if they
have an information need
- No matter what form the reference interview takes on, a form of
interpersonal communication takes place
- Is not and cannot be free of relational dimensions
- 1 good encounter ≠ 1 bad encounter
|
10
|
- When attempts to find information fail, patrons may choose to approach
the reference desk. If they do,
the librarian becomes the human interface or mediator between the
library and the users’ need.
- The critically important moment when users approach and engage the
librarian can be the point at which the complexities of the library are
gently explained, fears are calmed, and information becomes accessible.
- If help is withheld, given grudgingly, hurriedly, or in a condensing
manner, the encounter becomes the point at which the library appears
even more inaccessible. Users
can be left feeling confused, frustrated, and sometimes personally
defeated or humiliated.
- - paraphrased from Radford (99)
|
11
|
- Anomalous State of Knowledge (ASK)
- A state in which the user “is unable to specify precisely what is
needed to address their need”
- To help the librarian understand the needs of the user, Taylor (68) uses
5 question filters
- Subject
- Objective and motivation
- Personal characteristics of the inquirer
- Anticipated or acceptable answers
- Escalator Questions
|
12
|
- Directional
- e.g., Where are the photocopiers?
- 30-50% of all questions
- 1 minute or less
- Ready reference – “factoid” questions
- e.g., Who is the prime minister of China?
- 50-60%
- 90% can be answered using standard references; 10%
- Specific-search
- e.g., Where can I find information on sexism in business?
- 20%-40%
- Depends on sources available
- Research Questions
- c.f., information ecology
- very low frequency
- Depends, but generally longer and more challenging (and fun)
|
13
|
- In a recent study at Yahoo!, Rose and Levinson categorized three broad
areas:
- Navigational
- Go to a website
- E.g., aloha airlines
- Informational
- Learn something
- E.g., 2004 election dates
- Resource
- Download something / view something
- E.g., kazaa lite
|
14
|
- The question alone does not determine its type
- Aspects of the user
- (adult, child, professor, student under deadline)
- Scope of the query
- (just for fun, winning a bet, for research)
|
15
|
- Yes
- Patient may have self-diagnosed condition (formulated question), but
physician needs to check whether it is right (question answer would
actually meet users needs).
- No
- Reference librarians have to deal with demand flow, most doctors have
set appointment times.
|
16
|
- Once understood, the query has to be transformed into a search strategy
- e.g., does the scope of the query imply an article, a book or a
bibliography? Do I need to do a
catalog search?
- Once material is found, is it actually appropriate to the user?
- e.g., is the material suitable for citation in a high school report or
research publication?
|
17
|
- Access
- Bibliography
- e.g., controlled bibliographies & (union) catalogs
- Source
- Encyclopedias
- Fact Sources
- Dictionaries
- Biographical Sources
- Geographical Sources
|
18
|
- Primary sources
- Conference proceedings, journal articles
- Monographs
- Secondary
- Tertiary
|
19
|
- Many criteria to consider, but:
- Purpose
- Authority
- Scope
- Audience
- Cost
- Format
|
20
|
|
21
|
- No matter what the technology is, the goal remains to answer questions
- William Katz (Reference services guru)
|
22
|
- We have enticed the academy into cyberspace…without us.
- We have proven the value of library resources…but not the librarian
- - R. David Lankes
(Director of Institute of Information Systems,
Syracuse University)
|
23
|
- Question Answering systems
- AskA services
- Cutting edge trends
|
24
|
- The state of the art system question answering system gets about 60-80%
of “factoid” ready-reference questions answered correctly.
- - TREC competition results (02)
|
25
|
- Question Triage
- Sorting and routing questions
- Ask A services
- Differ on
- Cost: Fee or free
- Turnaround time
- Area of expertise
- Rating / Feedback on experts
|
26
|
- a.k.a. “AskA” services
- Internet-based question-and-answer services that connect users with
experts and subject expertise.
- Connect people with people
|
27
|
|
28
|
|
29
|
|
30
|
- This service provides support to AskA services by accepting out-of-scope
and overflow questions.
- When a subject-specific service gets questions out of its scope, it
forwards them to the VRDN.
- If a question cannot be addressed by another member, it is handled by a
VRD core librarian.
|
31
|
- Sloan (02)’s statistics
- Types of questions (n = 877)
- Research questions – 30%
- “I need five articles for…” – 20%
- Known item questions – 8%)
- Ready reference questions – 14%
- Library use questions – 8%
- Library technical questions – 9%
- Wait time
- 63% of users waited fewer than 30 seconds
- 73.5% in one minute or less
|
32
|
- Question session as a data object to be studied and statistically
analyzed.
- Collaboration strategies to bring users to experts 24/7.
- HCI studies and chat/email/dialog toolkits to make user interactions
seem more polite and pleasant.
- Melding of automatic methods with manual ones.
|
33
|
- Virtual Reference Desk
- (conferences proceedings also online)
- http://www.vrd.org/
|
34
|
|
35
|
- Don’t want to limit to “retrieval”
- IR: match query to documents.
- Seeking as the larger context: berrypicking
- We’ll revisit IR later in another lecture
|
36
|
- Taylor’s (68) model of need
- Visceral: The actual, but unexpressed need
- Conscious: (ambiguous) need, not necessarily verbalized
- Formalized: e.g., a search statement
- Compromised: Adapting the question to the resources at hand (the
information system)
|
37
|
- “… picking blueberries in the forest.
The berries are scattered on the bushes; they do not come in
bunches. One must pick them one
at a time…”
- - paraphrased from Bates (89)
- The nature of the query is an evolving one
- The nature of the search process is such that it follows a berrypicking
pattern
- The query is satisfied not by a final set of documents but by references
and information accumulated over the search period.
|
38
|
- Techniques that expert searchers use:
- Footnote chasing (a.k.a. backward chaining)
- Citation searching (a.k.a. forward chaining)
- Journal run
- Area scanning
- Subject search in bibliographies and indices
- Author search
- To think about: How well does LINC support these functions? How about Google?
|
39
|
- The fact that a user is looking for something means that they don’t
know what exactly they are looking for (otherwise, they wouldn’t be
looking in the first place)
- - paraphrased from Belkin et al. (82)
- Therefore, they may not be using the right vocabulary to express their
needs.
|
40
|
- means that the seeker realizes that there is a gap or lack of knowledge
in some area: an ASK.
- Partial or even incorrect search results can alter the ASK and change
the seeker’s perception.
|
41
|
|
42
|
- Selecting a source that is most relevant and useful
- Purpose
- Authority
- Scope
- Audience
- Cost
- Format
|
43
|
- Initiation: uncertainty
- Selection: optimism
- Exploration: confusion/frustration/doubt
- Formulation: clarity
- Collection: sense of direction and confidence
- Presentation: satisfaction or disappointment
|
44
|
- Users tend to try to move towards
certainty
- Vague, invitation mode transforms to focused, indicative mode
- Corollaries:
- Too much redundant information = boredom
- Too much unique information = anxiety
- Unfocused search without selection/formulation gives information
overload = anxiety
|
45
|
- Often the most important situational factor:
- Perceived source accessibility
- Principle of Least Effort – Zipf 49
- Rural libraries get less utilized than urban ones
- RBR / ILL services / acquisition library features rarely used
|
46
|
- Physical / Automated library
- Physical (gaining access to the store):
- Location, location, location!
- Interface (translating a need to the store):
- Catalog use, organization of library
- Informational (retrieving potentially relevant information):
- Locating the book, article
- What about the digital library?
|
47
|
- People often access easily accessible material first irrespective of
quality
- But informed professionals accept ideas from sources in proportion to
their technical quality
- But what about the uninformed?
|
48
|
|