1
|
- Usability of OPACs and retrieval engines*
- Week 9 KAN Min-Yen
- * Mostly based on Hearst’s Chapter in
Modern Information Retrieval
|
2
|
- For digital libraries, it is the means of expediting the information
seeking process for a human user
- “When an interactive system is well-designed, the interface almost
disappears, enabling users to concentrate on their work, exploration and
pleasure” --- Shneiderman 97
|
3
|
- Offer informative feedback
- Reduce working memory load
- Provide alternative interfaces for novice and expert users
- Methods:
- Color and Highlighting
- Pan / Zoom
- Focus + Context
- Overview + Details
|
4
|
- Ergonomics (human factors)
- time to learn
- speed of performance
- rate of errors
- retention over time
- subjective satisfaction
|
5
|
|
6
|
- Searching
- Query formulation
- Displaying results
- Browsing
- Categories and Hierarchies
- Integrating Frameworks
|
7
|
- Old: originated from command line interfaces
- Suit the system, not the user
- e.g. “FIND TW Mt St. Helens AND DATE 1981”
- Then: translated for users on OPACs
- Subject:
- Date: 1980 – 1985 1986-1990
- Now: graphical means for query specification
|
8
|
|
9
|
- Users can select from the set of attributes and get an appropriate
filter widget
- (type-in for interest areas, sliders for cost, and buttons for
scholarships)
- The widget is placed on the screen with flow lines showing ANDs
(sequential flow) and ORs (parallel flows).
- Water flow dynamically indicates relevant # of items
|
10
|
- Lists
- Seen on last slide from Filter / Flow
- Only good if limited number of entries
- Partial Fill-in
- Show possible completions of query terms if under a certain number (~
5)
- Re-writing of form fill-in queries
- Who is the leader of Sudan? à
Who is the head of state of X (Sudan)?
|
11
|
- Use table to represent conjunction and disjunction
- Conjunction (AND): rows
- Disjunction: columns
- Use activation to see query preview from index
|
12
|
|
13
|
- Faceted objects give rise to easy methods for summarizing the data
- The Flamenco Project http://flamenco.sims.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/flamenco/arts/Flamenco?username=default
- Facet Map
http://facetmap.com
|
14
|
|
15
|
- Geospatial data makes the 2 & 3-D visualization a good metaphor
|
16
|
- Point-in-polygon
- Region
- Distance and Buffer Zone
- Path
- Multimedia
|
17
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
- Each row represents a topic (conjunction)
- The darkness of each tile in a row represent the frequency of occurrence
of an item
|
20
|
- Explosion of the Venn Diagram
- Uses shape and color to
model to organize
results
|
21
|
|
22
|
- Searching a software technical manual
- Use a expandable table of contents to show results
- Shows hits within each level as query preview
- Closely modeled by browser in Windows Explorer
- 12 An Interactive Environment
- 10 Preface
- 1 How to Beat the Lottery
- 1 Tutorial Introduction to
- 7 Graphical Methods in S
- 2 Loading in Data
- …
- 3 Building Plots
- 2 Specialized Plots
- 2 Advanced Use of S
- 2 Appendix I
|
23
|
- Brings this paradigm to website searching
|
24
|
- http://www.tablelens.com
- Focus + context to give fisheye distortion to table rows and values
|
25
|
|
26
|
|
27
|
|
28
|
- Fisheye zoom
(Furnas 84)
- One implementation: Inxight’s StarTree
- http://www.inxight.com/
VizServerDemos/demo/
nasa/index.html
|
29
|
- Like Superbook, but trades focus for extractive summary (Kan et al. 02)
- Relevant: information for summary
- Irrelevant: too broad or not on topic,
for broader queries
- Intricate: too detailed,
for follow-ups
|
30
|
- Norm for a particular type of document
- (e.g. travel leaflets, Univ. department descriptions)
- Create by aligning topics in trees by similarity
|
31
|
|
32
|
- Multiple interfaces possible
- Columnar style
- Drop down list style
- Indented ancestors
|
33
|
- More than two views of the same space
- Lenses show and hide information that isn’t pertinent
- Has been applied in query focusing as well
- Demo: http://www.memorialhall.mass.edu/activities/media.jsp?itemid=15414&img=0
|
34
|
|
35
|
|
36
|
|
37
|
- Koenenmann and Belkin (96) checked whether relevance feedback helped
users
- Control: no RF
- Opaque: saw new documents
- Transparent: can see modifications
- Penetrable: can see modifications and change them
- Possible conclusion: RF can help users create better queries as a form
of online training
|
38
|
- Relevance feedback as one form
- Pros:
- Saved searches can help tune a generic system
- Decide whether to use advance or naïve interface for person
- Start off where one left off
- Cons:
- Need to track the user
- What happens if multiple purposes or used for guests?
- (e.g. Buying gifts for a
friend)
|
39
|
- New systems show advanced text and graphics / animated displays but many
are not yet well-evaluated
- Tighter integration in query and display
- Simultaneous browsing and searching support at all levels
- Screen real estate proportions in frameworks dictate useful alternatives
|
40
|
- What types of information do these various UI need to calculate at
run-time and what types can be pre-computed?
- How do these UI support the tenets we mentioned at the beginning?
- Do you feel that HTML / WWW has enhanced UI design or deterred its
creativity?
- For images and audio:
- When is query by example a useful technique and when is it inferior to
a search using metadata?
|