|
1
|
- Module 1 Min-Yen KAN
- Fundamentals of LIS
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Process where the user comes to the reference desk and asks for
information
- What type of information do people ask for?
- What are the characteristics of a reference interview?
- What factors lead to a “successful” reference interview?
- How do we evaluate reference interviews?
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Check whether a (human) system provides the user with a right answer
- Complete
- Accurate and timely
- What is the percentage of questions answered correctly?
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- The librarian:
- I think it went all right from my viewpoint because I didn’t have to
really interact too much. She
seemed capable, she seemed to know what she was doing. I felt she had found what she wanted
because she said she had what she needed. She seemed to be capable of handling
it on her own.
- - Radford (99)
|
|
8
|
- The student:
- I felt like she couldn’t help me on my subject. Isn’t that she didn’t know the
answer, but I felt that she didn’t want to [help]… she looked like she
did not know what I was talking about, a blank stare and also almost
like irritated.
|
|
9
|
- When a group of MLS students were sent on a mission to the library to
ask a question…
- __% said that they might ask another question in the future
- __% said that they wouldn’t bother asking the librarian even if they
have an information need
- No matter what form the reference interview takes on, a form of
interpersonal communication takes place
- Is not and cannot be free of relational dimensions
|
|
10
|
- When attempts to find information fail, patrons may choose to approach
the reference desk. If they do,
the librarian becomes the human interface or mediator between the
library and the users’ need.
- The critically important moment when users approach and engage the
librarian can be the point at which the complexities of the library are
gently explained, fears are calmed, and information becomes accessible.
- If help is withheld, given grudgingly, hurriedly, or in a condensing
manner, the encounter becomes the point at which the library appears
even more inaccessible. Users
can be left feeling confused, frustrated, and sometimes personally
defeated or humiliated.
- - paraphrased from Radford (99)
|
|
11
|
- Anomalous State of Knowledge (ASK)
- A state in which the user “is unable to specify precisely what is
needed to address their need”
- To help the librarian understand the needs of the user, Taylor (68) uses
5 question filters
- Subject
- Objective and motivation
- Escalator Questions
|
|
12
|
- Directional
- e.g., Where are the photocopiers?
- 30-50% of all questions
- 1 minute or less
- Ready reference – “factoid” questions
- e.g., Who is the prime minister of China?
- 50-60%
- 90% can be answered using standard references; 10%
- Specific-search
- e.g., Where can I find information on sexism in business?
- 20%-40%
- Depends on sources available
- Research Questions
- c.f., information ecology
- very low frequency
- Depends, but generally longer and more challenging (and fun)
|
|
13
|
- The question alone does not determine its type
- Aspects of the user
- (adult, child, professor, student under deadline)
- Scope of the query
- (just for fun, winning a bet, for research)
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Once understood, the query has to be transformed into a search strategy
- e.g., does the scope of the query imply an article, a book or a
bibliography? Do I need to do a
catalog search?
- Once material is found, is it actually appropriate to the user?
- e.g., is the material suitable for citation in a high school report or
research publication?
|
|
16
|
- Access
- Bibliography
- e.g., controlled bibliographies & (union) catalogs
- Source
- Encyclopedias
- Fact Sources
- Dictionaries
- Biographical Sources
- Geographical Sources
|
|
17
|
- Primary sources
- Secondary
- Tertiary
|
|
18
|
- Many criteria to consider, but:
- Purpose
- Authority
- Scope
- Audience
- Cost
- Format
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- No matter what the technology is, the goal remains to answer questions
- William Katz (Reference services guru)
|
|
21
|
- We have enticed the academy into cyberspace…without us.
- We have proven the value of library resources…but not the librarian
- - R. David Lankes
(Director of Institute of Information Systems,
Syracuse University)
|
|
22
|
- Question Answering systems
- AskA services
- Cutting edge trends
|
|
23
|
- The state of the art system question answering system gets about ______
of “factoid” ready-reference questions answered correctly.
- - TREC competition results (02)
|
|
24
|
- Question Triage
- Sorting and routing questions
- Ask A services
- Differ on
- Cost: Fee or free
- Turnaround time
- Area of expertise
- Rating / Feedback on experts
|
|
25
|
- a.k.a. “AskA” services
- Internet-based question-and-answer services that connect users with
experts and subject expertise.
- Connect people with people
|
|
26
|
- This service provides support to AskA services by accepting out-of-scope
and overflow questions.
- When a subject-specific service gets questions out of its scope, it
forwards them to the VRDN.
- If a question cannot be addressed by another member, it is handled by a
VRD core librarian.
|
|
27
|
- Sloan (02)’s statistics
- Types of questions (n = 877)
- Research questions – 30%
- “I need five articles for…” – 20%
- Known item questions – 8%)
- Ready reference questions – 14%
- Library use questions – 8%
- Library technical questions – 9%
- Wait time
- 63% of users waited fewer than 30 seconds
- 73.5% in one minute or less
|
|
28
|
- Question session as a data object to be studied and statistically
analyzed.
- Collaboration strategies to bring users to experts 24/7.
- HCI studies and chat/email/dialog toolkits to make user interactions
seem more polite and pleasant.
- Melding of automatic methods with manual ones.
|
|
29
|
- Virtual Reference Desk
- (conferences proceedings also online)
- http://www.vrd.org/
- Alliance Library Ready Reference
- (used in Sloan’s study, including data)
- http://www.alliancelibrarysystem.com/Projects/ReadyRef/index.html
|