Digital Library Policy
|
|
|
Legal, Economical, and Social Aspects |
|
|
|
Module 10 Min-Yen KAN |
Outline
|
|
|
Intellectual property rights |
|
|
|
Economics of the (digital) library |
|
|
|
Social Policy with respect to the DL |
Jerome’s translation of
the Bible
|
|
|
Perhaps the first copyright dispute |
|
In 521, the Irish missionary Columba
secretly copied a very treasured translation of the Bible. When his master Finnian found out, he
demanded that Columba turn over the copy.
Columba refused and the matter went to the High King of Ireland,
Diarmit. |
|
|
|
What do you guess the ruling was? |
|
_____________________________ |
|
Lerner, The story of libraries, p. 41 |
Intellectual property
rights
|
|
|
Copyright Law |
|
Fair Use |
|
First Sale |
Two worlds: digital and
print media
Rights Management
|
|
|
|
In general, |
|
“Rights” can mean many things: |
|
Access rights – can I see/use/copy it? |
|
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) –
who owns it? Where do I go to get
access rights? |
Access Policy
|
|
|
We have been mostly concentrating on
making the distribution of materials as easy and quick as possible. |
|
But that’s not
always the case. |
Restricting Access in DLs
|
|
|
|
Integrated with the Warwick Framework |
|
Cryptolope |
|
Steganography /
Document watermarking |
|
Hardware solutions |
|
No copy protection |
|
Better than it may seem |
Copyrights
|
|
|
Copyright |
|
Public domain |
|
Open source |
Open Source Licensing
|
|
|
All open source licenses: |
|
Allow free redistribution, |
|
Make the source code available |
|
Allow derived works (modify the code
and offer a “new” program) |
|
Must not discriminate against persons,
groups, or fields of endeavor |
|
Must not be product specific |
|
MIT License which grants unrestricted
rights to copy, modify, and redistribute as long as the original copyright
and license terms are retained. |
|
BSD License requires acknowledgements
to be made in advertisements and documentation. |
|
The ____________ allows unrestricted
rights to copy, use, and locally modify. It allows the redistribution of
modified binary programs, but restricts distribution of modified sources. |
|
The GNU General Public License (GPL)
requires that a program that uses portions of GPL'ed source code must also be
licensed under the GPL. |
Take a quick break: a
survey
|
|
|
|
How much do you value your library? |
|
|
|
Take a guess! à |
|
|
|
|
|
Here’s are some ways to do it. |
|
What’s the cost of buying the sources
yourself? |
|
What’s the opportunity cost if you
didn’t have access to the information? |
A cost model for
libraries
|
|
|
|
Griffiths & King (93): corporate
employees |
|
Found that US companies spent about
$400-1K per capita on libraries. |
|
Reported about 3:1 return on investment |
|
With library: |
|
$515 Library subscription
cost |
|
$95 Library |
|
|
|
No library: |
|
$3300 Cost to access
individual materials |
|
|
|
These cost only includes buying
material, not administrative time in acquiring them. |
|
So actual savings is ________ |
A brief history of the
economics of information
|
|
|
|
Ancient Era |
|
Public – for _________________ |
|
Private – for _________________ |
|
|
|
The copying of the Bible by monks in
the dark ages |
|
To educate them |
|
To spread religion |
Gutenberg printing press
|
|
|
|
|
Johann Gutenberg
(c. 1397-1468): |
|
Neither the inventor of moveable type
nor printing |
|
Paired a wine press with moveable type |
|
|
|
Transformed Europe’s spread of
information |
|
First publication was the Bible |
|
________________ |
The dichotomy today
|
|
|
|
|
Public – for religious conversion
government clearinghouse |
|
Make sure the public has: |
|
Access to the information |
|
Gets authoritative information |
|
|
|
Private – for knowledge and
prestige
business and entertainment |
Economics of scholarly
media
|
|
|
Will the automated library as we know
it survive? |
Economics of scholarly
media
|
|
|
Will the automated library as we know
it survive? |
Two worlds: digital and
print media
Models for digital
economies
|
|
|
|
Subscription fees |
|
Per month, per year |
|
Connection time fee |
|
Per minute (e.g., Mead Data Central) |
|
Advertising |
|
By an interested party |
|
other economic models apply here |
|
Access fee |
|
Per download, may not have profile to
remember that you accessed this resource before |
|
Per-byte fee |
|
Typical of connection services (e.g.,
Broadband) |
Access versus ownership
|
|
|
|
With DL materials we can’t really track
ownership, just access |
|
|
|
Trend towards ______________ |
|
Publisher: better targeted marketing |
|
Library: better profile of user
community |
|
|
Crisis for publishers
|
|
|
|
Ease of publication allows more
information to be free |
|
And for people to break copyright
(perhaps accidentally) |
|
|
|
Ease of accessing (free) information
deters users from accessing more cumbersome-to-use sources |
|
c.f., Zipf’s law |
|
|
|
Traditional functions of publishers are
taken on by free services |
|
Free e-journals do rigorous peer review |
|
Search engines act as distributor |
Self-archiving
|
|
|
|
|
To deposit a digital document in a publicly
accessible website. |
|
Preprint: before copyright restrictions
have been signed |
|
|
|
Not a true publication*:
________________________________. |
|
|
|
Detractors: accessibility will hurt
future revenues of the journal |
|
Perhaps 60-80% of a publisher’s budget
doesn’t go towards the direct publication costs |
E-prints
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differing acceptance from different
fields |
|
Physics: accept only if concurrently
preprinted |
|
Medicine, Business: accept only if not
preprinted |
|
|
|
E-journal model: who assumes the cost? |
|
Authoring a text |
|
Peer review |
|
Marketing |
|
Editor |
|
Publication |
Peer review limitations
|
|
|
|
Goal of peer review is to insure: |
|
Previous work adequately acknowledged |
|
Experimental methodology realistic and
reproducible |
|
Analysis of data justifies conclusions |
|
|
|
Peters and Ceci (82): |
|
Resubmitted 12 psychology articles
already published with different author names, 8 of 9 recommended against
acceptance and were rejected “serious methodological flaw”, not because of
déjà vu. |
|
|
|
Inglefinger study of NEJM reviewers: |
|
Concordance of reviews only slightly
better than chance |
|
Reviewers not skilled in all areas of a
study, unable to discern poor writing and have their own biases |
|
|
Cost structuring
|
|
|
Movie distribution as a possible model (Lesk,
p. 206) |
|
|
|
|
Legal Deposit
Preservation
|
|
|
|
Y2K – two digits to mean four |
|
If you knew COBOL, you could get a high
paid job. |
|
Legacy systems and knowledge need to be
preserved |
|
|
|
Use standard formats! |
|
Media lifetime |
|
Tape 15 years |
|
CDR ________ |
|
HD 30 years |
|
|
|
Software/Hardware lifetime |
|
New hardware 3-7 years |
|
Software cycles faster |
|
How to access old files, applications? |
The Digital Divide
|
|
|
A case of the rich getting richer? |
Undoing the Divide
|
|
|
|
Can use access rights to impose an
unequal payment scheme |
|
|
|
Blackwell’s – all 600 journals made
free to the Russian Federation. |
|
JSTOR – cost to access its DL depends
on the size of the organization. |
|
Open source movement – make software
available to anyone |
Libraries of the Future
|
|
|
Immediate, random-access to recent
knowledge |
|
May not understand foundation material |
|
More effort in selection of materials |
|
Publisher models changing, unifying |
|
International policy becoming more
prominent |
|
Customized books as the future? |
That’s it
|
|
|
Hope it has been
a fun trip for you! |
References
|
|
|
Copyright in Singapore
http://www.ipos.gov.sg/newdesign/indexpage/inner_frame.html?section=aboutip&sub=4 |
|
|
|
Self-Archiving FAQ
http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/ |
|
|
|
JSTOR |
|
www.jstor.org |
|
|
|
The future of libraries?
Stephenson, Neal (00) Diamond Age: A young lady’s illustrated primer,
Doubleday |
To think about…
|
|
|
|
How does the economics of libraries and
the information explosion influence Bradford’s law? |
|
|
|
Do you think self-archiving and
e-journal venues pose a threat to the journal publisher? |
|
|
|
As a single site, the Internet
Archives, can’t hope to keep track of all web pages on the net |
|
Can you think of a better solution? |
|
How would you go about designing a
national web page archive for Singapore? |