|
1
|
- Module 2 Min-Yen KAN
- Fundamentals of LIS -Part II
- Reference Interviews and
Library Evaluation
|
|
2
|
- Reference Interviews
- Library Evaluation
- Details on Course Assessment
- Final Thoughts
|
|
3
|
- Survey Paper
- Due: 3 Sep
- Format: 6 papers at a minimum
- Purpose: to get you acquainted with an area of DL in more depth.
- Will lead to mini lectures
- Can lead to related work in class project report
- Class Project
- Due: 29 Oct
- Format: conference paper
- Purpose: novel contribution to research in DL
- Presentation of in poster session at end of class
- Can be experimental, theoretical or purely implementation
|
|
4
|
- Automated Collection Building
- Digital Library Social Policy
- Domain Specific DLs
- Intelligent Agents in DLs
- Metadata Extraction and Indexing
- Metadata Harvesting and Metasearching
- Mobile platform DL usability
- Music in Digital Libraries
Recommender Systems
- Spatial and Temporal DLs
- Speech in Digital Libraries
- Web/Hypertext Information Seeking
|
|
5
|
CHAN YEE SENG (Spatial and Temporal DLs)
CHEN XI (Metadata Extraction and Indexing)
EDWARD WIJAYA (Metadata Extraction and Indexing)
GUO SHUQIAO
HENDRA SETIAWAN (Metadata Extraction and Indexing)
HUANG WENDONG (Music in Digital Libraries)
LI YINGGUANG (Metadata Extraction and Indexing)
LIN LI
LIU CHENGLIANG
MASLENNIKOV MSTISLAV
- QIU LONG
TOK WEE HYONG (Intelligent Agents in DLs)
VOROBIEV ARTEM (Peer-to-Peer Systems in the DL)
WANG GANG
WANG XIAOHANG (Metadata Extraction and Indexing)
WONG SWEE SEONG
- YANG HUI
|
|
6
|
- Who would want to read your paper?
- What would they expect of it?
- What would make them satisfied with your paper?
- Is there a real need for this paper?
|
|
7
|
- Organizes and summarizes the work
- What’s the commonality in their problems, approaches and evaluation?
- How are they significantly different from each other with respect to
our topic of focus?
- How accurately does it capture the materials present?
- Are the papers chosen representative of the most relevant and highest
quality papers?
- What existing fields contribute to their expertise to research in this
area?
|
|
8
|
- Makes a value judgment or editorial comment on the paper
- What do you think the future research trends in this area are? Why?
- What do you think the significant barriers to progress in this field
are?
- What aspects of this area are underrepresented in the current research?
- Different from ACM Computing Surveys or ARIST chapters
- They emphasize an objective viewpoint
|
|
9
|
- Be succinct
- Make sure you edit and proofread your work. English usage will factor into your
grade if it hampers getting your points across
- A secondary source
- Provide an abstract
- Other: index, navigational tips, figures or tables.
|