| Module 2 Min-Yen KAN | |
| Fundamentals of LIS -Part II | |
| Reference Interviews and Library Evaluation |
| Reference Interviews | |
| Library Evaluation | |
| Details on Course Assessment | |
| Final Thoughts | |
| Survey Paper | |
| Due: 3 Sep | |
| Format: 6 papers at a minimum | |
| Purpose: to get you acquainted with an area of DL in more depth. | |
| Will lead to mini lectures | |
| Can lead to related work in class project report | |
| Class Project | |
| Due: 29 Oct | |
| Format: conference paper | |
| Purpose: novel contribution to research in DL | |
| Presentation of in poster session at end of class | |
| Can be experimental, theoretical or purely implementation |
| Automated Collection Building | |
| Digital Library Social Policy | |
| Domain Specific DLs | |
| Intelligent Agents in DLs | |
| Metadata Extraction and Indexing | |
| Metadata Harvesting and Metasearching | |
| Mobile platform DL usability | |
| Music in Digital Libraries Recommender Systems |
|
| Spatial and Temporal DLs | |
| Speech in Digital Libraries | |
| Web/Hypertext Information Seeking | |
CHAN YEE SENG (Spatial and Temporal DLs) CHEN XI (Metadata Extraction and Indexing) EDWARD WIJAYA (Metadata Extraction and Indexing) GUO SHUQIAO |
|
HENDRA SETIAWAN (Metadata Extraction and Indexing) HUANG WENDONG (Music in Digital Libraries) LI YINGGUANG (Metadata Extraction and Indexing) LIN LI LIU CHENGLIANG |
|
MASLENNIKOV MSTISLAV |
|
| QIU LONG | |
TOK WEE HYONG (Intelligent Agents in DLs) VOROBIEV ARTEM (Peer-to-Peer Systems in the DL) |
|
WANG GANG |
|
WANG XIAOHANG (Metadata Extraction and Indexing) WONG SWEE SEONG |
|
| YANG HUI |
| Who would want to read your paper? | |
| What would they expect of it? | |
| What would make them satisfied with your paper? | |
| Is there a real need for this paper? |
The survey as a synthesis of information
| Organizes and summarizes the work | ||
| What’s the commonality in their problems, approaches and evaluation? | ||
| How are they significantly different from each other with respect to our topic of focus? | ||
| How accurately does it capture the materials present? | ||
| Are the papers chosen representative of the most relevant and highest quality papers? | ||
| What existing fields contribute to their expertise to research in this area? | ||
The survey as a critical review
| Makes a value judgment or editorial comment on the paper | |||
| What do you think the future research trends in this area are? Why? | |||
| What do you think the significant barriers to progress in this field are? | |||
| What aspects of this area are underrepresented in the current research? | |||
| Different from ACM Computing Surveys or ARIST chapters | |||
| They emphasize an objective viewpoint | |||
| Be succinct | ||
| Make sure you edit and proofread your work. English usage will factor into your grade if it hampers getting your points across | ||
| A secondary source | ||
| Provide an abstract | ||
| Other: index, navigational tips, figures or tables. | ||