<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code-Switching | Web IR NLP Group @ NUS</title><link>https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~kanmy/wing/tag/code-switching/</link><atom:link href="https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~kanmy/wing/tag/code-switching/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Code-Switching</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Is Knowledge in Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingually Consistent?</title><link>https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~kanmy/wing/project/knowledge-consistency/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~kanmy/wing/project/knowledge-consistency/</guid><description>&lt;p>Few works study the variation and cross-lingual consistency of factual knowledge embedded in multilingual models. However, cross-lingual consistency should be considered to assess cross-lingual transferability, maintain the factuality of the model knowledge across languages, and preserve the parity of language model performance. We are thus interested in analyzing, evaluating, and interpreting cross-lingual consistency for factual knowledge. We apply interpretability approaches to analyze the behavior of a model in cross-lingual contexts, discovering that multilingual models show different levels of consistency, subject to language families or linguistic factors. In addition, we identify a bottleneck in cross-lingual consistency on a particular layer. To mitigate this problem, we try vocabulary expansion, adding biases from monolingual inputs, and different types of supervision consisting of additional cross-lingual word alignment objective, instruction tuning, and code-switching training. We find that among these methods, code-switching training and cross-lingual word alignment objective show the most promising results, emphasizing the noteworthiness of cross-lingual alignment supervision for cross-lingual consistency enhancement.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>