Filtered by: School of Computing
Professor Anthony Tung from NUS Computing was quoted in The Business Times on 15 September on what a slowdown in AI development would need to look like in practice, and where Singapore fits in.
The article followed an essay by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calling for a slower pace of AI capability development, backed by third-party evaluators, common safety standards and coordination between governments. Prof Tung, who is also AI lead for urban sustainability at the NUS AI Institute, said what is currently missing is rules with teeth: there are no agreed conditions for when an AI lab should stop, or what evidence should allow it to proceed. His suggestion is that a lab release a capability only as fast as accredited independent evaluators can assess it, so that the pace is set by evaluation throughput rather than by a competitor's release schedule. He cautioned that obligations should scale with risk, as a one-size-fits-all approach risks entrenching the very frontier labs regulation is meant to restrain.
On Singapore's position, Prof Tung noted that accreditation under schemes such as AI Verify establishes that a tester is competent within a defined scope, not that an AI system is safe. He pointed to a gap in how software safety, cybersecurity and AI safety are treated as separate disciplines with separate funding and regulators, even as incidents increasingly span all three, and suggested Singapore set up an institute with a mandate across all three areas. "A slowdown on its own is not a safety policy," he said, adding that the time gained has to be invested in better evaluation, stronger safeguards and more resilient systems around AI.
Through Computing for Voluntary Welfare Organisations (CVWO), students at NUS Computing have built a mobile app that helps adults with autism report on their working day and get support when they need it.
Developed pro bono for the Autism Resource Centre (Singapore), Job Support Central lets adults enrolled in the Centre's Employability and Employment Centre (E2C) programme log how they are feeling at work, any difficulties they encountered and anything unexpected that came up, with reminders at 6pm and 10pm. Where the records suggest something is off over several days, a job coach is alerted to follow up, including a visit to the workplace where needed. Year 3 Computer Science student 列永忠, who worked on the app with five teammates over the summer break, told Zaobao that the hardest part was not digitising the workflow but understanding what the beneficiaries and the Centre actually needed.
The app was featured as CVWO marked its 20th anniversary on 11 September, with Minister for Digital Development and Information Josephine Teo as Guest of Honour. Speaking at the event, CVWO founder Associate Professor Ben Leong reminded students that writing software is about solving problems, not just technical skill. The Centre for Computing for Social Good and Philanthropy also received a S$1.5 million gift from Mr Keith Chua, trustee of the Mrs Lee Choon Guan Trust Fund , in support of CVWO.
This episode of Ethiroli examined the growing threat of deepfake-enabled scams, with a particular focus on elderly victims targeted through investment fraud schemes circulated on messaging platforms. The segment covered why why elderly viewers are disproportionately affected, alongside broader risks, including fake explicit content targeting younger users and fraudulent business impersonation.
Dr Prahbu Natarajan from the Department of Computer Science shared practical detection methods, including listening for audio inconsistencies when comparing suspect clips against known genuine recordings. The programme also featured a live demonstration by Associate Professor Terence Sim, who showed how convincingly a video and voice can be fabricated using a short audio sample, reinforcing the segment's message that deepfake creation now requires minimal technical skill.
Vasantham Ethiroli (2 September): S23 Ep 21 Deepfake: The New Face of Deception
Four Computers Science undergraduates from NUS Computing were featured in The Straits Times for AHMA, an AI-powered app designed to help caregivers in Singapore find support services that match their needs.
Aishwarya Goyal, Hazel Low, Abhishek Paranjape and Andrew Soon began the project at a hackathon in 2025, drawing on their own experience caring for grandparents and supporting friends through mental health difficulties. Speaking to ST, Abhishek described the gap the team chose to work on as resource navigation: Singapore's social service agencies and government schemes offer a great deal to caregivers, but many struggle to work out which options apply to them.
AHMA uses a voice interface as its primary mode of interaction, a choice the team made with older caregivers in mind. A user can speak to the app about their situation and receive encouragement along with pointers to relevant community organisations. It currently supports English, Malay and Mandarin, and the team is working on adding dialects. The text-to-speech model was trained on Aishwarya's voice so that it sounds familiar to Singaporean users.
The students have been gathering feedback from caregivers, including at a recent session run by Mindfull Community, a non-profit that supports caregivers and families of people with mental health conditions. Hazel told ST that co-creating with caregivers is central to how the team works. Mindfull's deputy head of partnerships, Samantha Foo, said the sessions were valuable for both sides, and that the organisation intends to review the app once a working version is ready.
The team plans to launch a working product in the coming months.
Provost's Chair Professor Hahn Jungpil from the Department of Information Systems and Analytics joined CNA938 The Big Question, to discuss two Singapore-made AI-generated films that have reignited debate over AI's role in creative work – and where the line sits between AI as a tool and AI as a crutch.
Prof Hahn warned that critical thinking is the skill most at risk of quietly fading: "It's so accessible, and it provides relatively good output right from the start. You have to dig deeper, challenge it, even fight with it, to get really good content out of it. A lot of people, especially students, stop short of doing that and just accept what they're given. That's the real danger – we stop exercising our own reasoning."
He also argued that augmentation and replacement aren't opposites but a matter of time: "Augmentation only stays augmentation if you deliberately keep a hand in what you're doing, and that's a very difficult thing to do day to day." Left unchecked, he said, this deskilling happens quietly – "AI attacks that aspect of skills development most critically, and invisibly. We don't realise it until the skill is gone." – with judgement itself eroding the less it's exercised.
On NUS' move to make AI coursework compulsory for all undergraduates, he said assessment needs to evolve in step, favouring oral reasoning tests over take-home essays that AI can easily produce – so students are evaluated on how they think, not just what they output.
Listen to the full segment: CNA938 Rewind - The Big Question (13 Aug): How much is too much when it comes to AI?